Attachment A- FY20 NAS Pax River Shoreline Bathmetry & Redesign
Severe erosion along the shoreline of Cedar Point at NAS Patuxent River has resulted in a loss of approximately 275 feet of shoreline since 198 5. Stabilization efforts to the south of Cedar Point have halted erosion in that direction but have resulted in accelerated deterioration of the adjoining
shoreline and point to the north.
The original 2015 stabilization project was divided into three phases.
Phase 1 would utilize 1,335 LF of breakwaters to stabilize the point of CedarPoint as well as 2,358 LF of revetment and sills extending southwestward along the eastern shoreline, up to the mouth of Goose Creek.
Phase 2 consisted of approximately 5,173 LF of revetment that continued the eastern shoreline stabilization downwards from Goose Creek.
The final section of stabilization, Phase 3, would continue the Phase 2 revetment for an additional 2,809 LF, ending at the Chesapeake Basin.
Phase 2 has already been constructed.
Since thepurpose of this cooperative agreement is to provide for the implementation of the original design, the current stabilization measures have experienced elevation changes as well as underwater topography and stability.
The is to conduct surveys and bathymetry studies, re-evaluate existing site conditions for Phases 1 and 3,4 redesign the existing plans in order to account for environmental changes over the past 5 years, and to ensure successful future implementation of the remaining phases.
The original 2015 stabilization project was divided into three phases.
Phase 1 would utilize 1,335 LF of breakwaters to stabilize the point of CedarPoint as well as 2,358 LF of revetment and sills extending southwestward along the eastern shoreline, up to the mouth of Goose Creek.
Phase 2 consisted of approximately 5,173 LF of revetment that continued the eastern shoreline stabilization downwards from Goose Creek.
The final section of stabilization, Phase 3, would continue the Phase 2 revetment for an additional 2,809 LF, ending at the Chesapeake Basin.
Phase 2 has already been constructed.
Since thepurpose of this cooperative agreement is to provide for the implementation of the original design, the current stabilization measures have experienced elevation changes as well as underwater topography and stability.
The is to conduct surveys and bathymetry studies, re-evaluate existing site conditions for Phases 1 and 3,4 redesign the existing plans in order to account for environmental changes over the past 5 years, and to ensure successful future implementation of the remaining phases.
Relevant Nonprofit Program Categories
.jpg){kind=link}
Obtain Full Opportunity Text:
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PAR-20-266.html
Additional Information of Eligibility:
Other Eligible Applicants include the following: Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian Serving Institutions; Asian American Native American Pacific Islander Serving Institutions (AANAPISISs); Eligible Agencies of the Federal Government; Faith-based or Community-based Organizations; Hispanic-serving Institutions; Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs); Indian/Native American Tribal Governments (Other than Federally Recognized); Regional Organizations; Tribally Controlled Colleges and Universities (TCCUs) ; U. S. Territory or Possession; Non-domestic (non-U.S.) Entities (Foreign Institutions) are not eligible to apply.
Non-domestic (non-U.S.) components of U. S. Organizations are not eligible to apply.
Foreign components, as defined in the NIH Grants Policy Statement, are allowed.
Full Opportunity Web Address:
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PAR-20-266.html
Contact:
Agency Email Description:
olisha.costa@navy.mil
Agency Email:
Date Posted:
2020-07-14
Application Due Date:
Archive Date:
2020-09-23
Social Entrepreneurship
Spotlight
Keeping Half the Profits Beats Non-profits for Social Impact
Melbourne social enterprise Who Gives A Crap sold nearly 3 million rolls of toilet paper in 2014/15 and gave half the proceeds to WaterAid Australia, but co-founder Simon Griffiths says the donation would have been less had the startup adopted a non-profit model when it launched two years ago.
Learn How to Identify and Avoid Grant Scams
